Previous Print
Blawg Briefs
CIPO to Accept Registration of Sound Marks

The more we hear something, the more it resonates with us. Sound can be a powerful trigger. Many gamers would recognize the Super Mario theme song even if heard out of context, just as many movie-lovers would identify the Twentieth Century Fox drum roll by ear. Sounds can be, and often have been, significant components of a brand, product, or service. Sounds can assume the role of trade-marks, serving not only to link a consumer’s mind to an end-product, but also to distinguish a specific end-product from that offered elsewhere.

Nonetheless, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has previously taken the position that sound marks were not registrable. Only one sound mark was successfully registered, in 1989 (it has since been expunged for failure to renew), while others were denied registration. As of March 28, 2012, however, this has changed.

On March 1, 2012, the Federal Court of Canada issued an order allowing a sound-based application to proceed to advertising, and blazed the trail for the registrability of sound marks. The order comes as a result of litigation between the Canadian Trade-mark office and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corporation (MGM) concerning MGM’s application to register a sound mark consisting of a lion roaring, which application was originally filed with the trade-mark office in 1992. The application had been refused registration on the basis of section 30(h) of the Trade-marks Act, which requires an applicant to file a drawing of the trade-mark and such number of accurate representations of the trade-mark as may be prescribed, provided the mark is not a word mark. The Federal Court set aside such refusal, however, and instead approved that the trade-mark application be advertised in the Canadian Trade-marks Journal for the purposes of section 37(1) of the Trade-marks Act.

Full Article With Comments...

Tags

Canadian Trade-marks Journal
CIPO
Sound
Sound Marks
Trademark
Trade-marks Act
     

Authors

Karen D. Levin
A&B Donates One Million Aeroplan Miles to Help Children in Need

A&B is proud to announce that, on March 2, 2012, our firm donated one million Aeroplan miles to the Air Canada Foundation. The not-for-profit organization, which focuses on the health and well-being of children in need, was launched on February 29.

As one of the first donors to Air Canada’s new Foundation, we are pleased that our firm’s Aeroplan miles donation will be used to provide flights to children and their parents so that they can obtain medical care from pediatric hospitals, such as The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.

“We are grateful to Aird & Berlis LLP for their generous donation of one million Aeroplan miles to the newly launched Air Canada Foundation,” said Priscille LeBlanc, Chairman of the Air Canada Foundation. “These miles will directly benefit the Hospital Transportation Program which uses donated Aeroplan miles to transport ill children and a parent to centers offering medical treatment unavailable in their community.”

Full Article With Comments...

Tags

Aeroplan
Aeroplan Miles
Air Canada
Air Canada Foundation
Donation
Sick Kids
The Hospital for Sick Kids
Trademark
     

Authors

Aird & Berlis LLP
Search Entries
Go
Entries By Author
Go
Entries By Tag
Advantage Aeroplan Aeroplan Miles Age Air Canada Air Canada Foundation amicus briefs Bozzo Broadcasting Act Broader Public Sector Budget Budget 2013 Business Buy America Buying a Franchise Canada Canada Revenue Agency Canada Tax System Canada-Netherlands Tax Treaty Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation Canadian broadcasting Canadian copyright law Canadian Government Canadian law Canadian Pacific Railway Canadian Trade-marks Journal CDS Clearing and Depository Services Cerner Corp. Challenges CIPO CIRA Class Action cleantech clear and convincing evidence Commercial Activity Consent Consolidated Debenture Stock constitutional challenge consumer products contract errors contracts Copyright Copyright Act Copyright damages copyright extension acts Copyright infringement Copyright Modernization Act copyright policy copyright reform corporate governance Corporate Measures CRA Cross Border Outsourcing CRTC custom XML Densification digital downloads digital media levy Digital Millennium Copyright Act digital music Divisional Court Doing Business in Canada Domain Name domain name registry Domain names domain registry scam Donation Download dube East Texas District Economy eHealth eHealth Ontario electronic health records electronic medical records email scam empty voting Enforceability of terms of use Environment Eric Schmidt ERT evidence ex parte Excise Tax Act Expansion expired patents Facebook Failure Fair dealing fair use/fair dealing Federal Budget Federal Court of Appeal fee-for-carriage Fighting Internet and Wireless Spam Act file sharing FISA FIT Foreign foreign investment Foreign ownership Franchise Franchisor free trade FSB G20 summit G8 and G20 GameStation Gift GlaxoSmithKline Gmail goals Gold Payment Clause Google Google Buzz Google Buzz privacy Google executives Google Italy Google privacy Google privacy appeal Google Street View privacy governance issues government government policy green economy Green Energy GST Hanna House of Commons HST i4i ICANN IDN Improving Business Income Tax Act Income Taxt Act Industry Canada consultation Infrastructures for Information innovation intellectual property International Internationalized domain names Internet Internet competition Internet copyright issues internet domain name scam intrusion on seclusion invalidate patent inventiveness investing ISP Italy privacy law prosecution Jennifer Stoddart Jim Flaherty Jones v. Tsige judgment against Microsoft June Budget Justice Charles Hackland Law Law Times Lawson v. Accusearch Licensing LimeWire litigation local government M&A Magder v. Ford Manitoba’s Court of Queen’s Bench manufacturing Mason Capital Management LLC McNamee metadata Microsoft patent infringement Microsoft Word Multi-national Municipal Conflict of Interest Act municipal projects music industry music licensing Napster Nature of Transaction notice and takedown nuisance Office of the Privacy Commissioner Online Online Activity online contracts Ontario Ontario Court of Appeal Ontario Divisional Court Ontario Family Law Act OPA OPC outsourcing Owner Parliament patent system patents Personal Health Information personal information personal injury Personal Measures personally identifiable information PHIPA PIPEDA Planning Policy Politics Power preponderance of the evidence privacy Privacy Commission Privacy Compliance Privacy Policy privacy protection privacy rights private copying private equity procurement productivity Profit Proper Execution proxy battle public infrastructure Real Estate Real Property Association of Canada Reference re Broadcasting Act renewable energy Renewable Energy Approvals renewable power requisition RIAA Rob Ford selling your soul share consolidation shareholder activism shareholder democracy Shares Sick Kids social networking software patent Sound Sound Marks sparks St. Michael Trust Corp St. Michael Trust Corp. State Farm steganography Strengths Success Successful Franchise Systems Supply Chain Guideline Supreme Court Act Supreme Court of Canada Sydney, Australia Tax Tax Court of Canada Tax Credit Tax News Flash Taxpayer Technological Protection Measures technology Telecommunications TELUS Corporation The Financial Stability Board The Hospital for Sick Kids The Queen the U.S. dollar Toronto tort TPM Trademark Trade-marks Act Tranmer, J. transit transmission project Trusts Typosquatting United States UrbanGrowth NSW Annual Conference Usage Velcro Canada Inc. venture capital Weakness Webcrawling Website writ of certiorari XML YouTube
Entries By Date
User Settings
Login to select personalized notfications for this blog


Username
Password
Login
Register | Forgot your password?